What’s the scope of a local planning commission authority? When that commission is considering construction project approval at an oil refinery to enable five oil trains (each a mile long) arrive per week at that refinery, does the local planning commission have the authority to consider issues outside on-site safety and on-site environmental control? What about risks to communities along the rail lines? Oil trains do derail and often explode with intense fires. And what about the negative impact of gasoline/diesel consumption? Crude oil and its byproducts are extremely toxic, carcinogenic, and do serious harm to the environment and climate. The real problem is dependence on fossil fuels, and the impact of fossil fuel consumption, not oil train explosions.
In San Luis Obispo County (California), Phillips 66 owns a refinery in Santa Maria and hopes to expand its rail yard to accommodate crude oil deliveries by train. This process has been going on all over the country – increased oil production from fracking in North Dakota and other oil shale fields has unleashed a torrent of crude oil shipping by rail. Occasionally those trains derail, and thanks to the sort of cargo there is often an explosion and fire. About a year ago I covered a meeting in San Jose where some activist groups raised awareness of the upstream impact of crude oil shipments. The likely transport route for oil going to Santa Maria would pass through downtown San Jose, and through a bunch of backyards and other cities. In response the City of San Jose issued a statement decrying the danger to other communities if the refinery expansion goes through.
The theory San Jose presented is that, even though the refinery expansion is a local project, there is potential impact along the whole route of delivering the crude oil to that refinery. An oil train could derail anywhere along that route, and given the cargo on oil trains the derailment is likely to result in fire and explosion.
So far most oil train derailments occurred in remote areas. What if one happened in the downtown of a major city? The required mandatory evacuation zone is a 1-mile area.
Today and tomorrow the San Luis Obispo County Planning Commission is holding hearings on the Santa Maria project. Some friends of mine traveled there, and 350.org and other groups plan to hold a protest inside and outside the meeting.
According to local news reporting, Phillips 66 filed a letter with the planning commission responding to a County Staff report which recommends denial of the rail yard expansion. According to the New Times report,
The staff report recommends the commission deny the project based on a number of factors, including concerns over the environmental impacts of the project and increased train activity, as well as the potential for the trains to derail, causing leaks, fires, or even explosions.
In other words, the issues I raised above. The Phillips 66 response is to strongly disagree, and state that SLO County Staff “suggest conclusions contrary to law” in its report.
Saying that oil train safety was the purview of the federal government and not the commission, the Phillips 66 response said “As important as these questions are, they are not before the Planning Commission in this project. The United States Constitution and federal law places those questions in the hands of the federal government. And the federal government has established comprehensive programs that regulate the railroads in a way that is consistent across the country.”
In other words, Phillips 66 is telling the Commission to not consider the full impact of their decision.
Whatever is the best course for this decision, what Phillips 66 seeks to do is divide the decision making authority. One Commission can consider one aspect, another Commission can consider another aspect, and so on. Who, though, is responsible for deciding the merits of the entire project?
Clearly if SLO County allows this to go through, there is potential impact on communities far from their area of authority. And, the impact is not just due to potential oil train derailments. The impact is also from consumption of the products of that refinery.
There is no Commission I’m aware of that would consider the impact of the entire system. If that Commission existed it would have to weigh the impacts and benefits of the whole system.
- ABB challenges Tesla Supercharger network with 150 kiloWatt CHAdeMO/CCS DCFC charging station - October 4, 2017
- Dept of Energy moving forward with energy storage research projects, doubling down on renewable energy - September 18, 2017
- Nissan introduces 2018 Nissan Leaf, stressing autonomous driving over electric vehicle technology - September 5, 2017
- Jimmy Carter’s Crisis of Confidence speech was political disaster, but oh if we’d only stuck to his plan … - September 4, 2017
- Trump Administration fiddles in Washington while Houston drowns under extreme weather hurricane - August 28, 2017
- Is Tesla painting itself into a corner because Gigafactory only builds Lithium-ION cells? - August 14, 2017
- Uber, Lyft, reduce car ownership and car travel - August 11, 2017
- It’s Tesla Model 3 day, it’s not the second coming of Christ, but is it close? - July 30, 2017
- Calif. Gov. Jerry Brown signs climate change law extending cap-and-trade for 10 years - July 25, 2017
- Powerdown is a key, but little discussed, aspect to solving energy and climate problems - July 12, 2017