Last week “scores of concerned Baltimore residents” protested the dangers of exploding oil trains. Protesters note that oil trains follow a winding route through Baltimore that puts large swaths of Baltimore within the danger zone. In my neck of the woods the Phillips 66 refinery in San Luis Obispo is seeking to start taking crude oil by train from the Bakken, and there is a protest effort afoot with plans to protest at the planning commission meeting and there was a rally held in San Jose over the weekend.
As well meaning as these protests are, let me suggest that opposing oil trains as an explosion/fire risk is the wrong focus. That’s missing the real problem – the grossly negative environmental and climate damage from fossil fuel consumption – while focusing on something which is an engineering problem – fixing rail safety.
There is a real risk from oil trains. The rate of crude oil shipments by rail in the U.S. is rapidly rising due to the oil production boom at shale formations in North Dakota and elsewhere, as well as the tar sands oil being produced in Alberta. Because of a lack of oil pipelines to those areas, the oil industry has had to turn to rail shipping.
Unfortunately after decades of infrastructure neglect, the rail system see’s routine train derailments. It’s not a problem when a train full of household goods derails, but when it’s explosive crude oil the result can be a devastating explosion and fire that’s nearly impossible to extinguish. Generally fire crews elect to just let the fires burn themselves out because their equipment is insufficient to fight the ferocious blaze.
That means the news is full of fiery scenes like the one shown here – making it look like oil trains are the immediate risk. (you’ll see some oil train videos linked below)
Oil trains are instead a symptom of another problem, our dependence on fossil fuels and the collective dragging-of-heels about taking any real action to stop that dependence.
This is US crude oil production since 1920. The sharp increase in production since 2010ish is due to the Bakken fields, and other areas where fracking is taking place. The Alberta tar sands oil is not included in this chart, FWIW.
A big protest movement against oil train explosions would result not in the elimination of fossil fuels, but the elimination of explosions. The powers-that-be will focus on the immediate problem, erasing the negative image appearing in the news. They’ll work on rail safety and improved rail cars and on building pipelines, because pipelines are supposedly safer. Over time the exploding rail cars will disappear from the news… but …. we’ll all still be stuck with oil products, because nothing will have been done about fossil fuel dependence.
The oil companies wouldn’t be drilling for or shipping crude oil anywhere if we stopped buying their products.
The climate and environment wouldn’t be getting ravaged by toxins and pollution and greenhouse gasses if we stopped buying gasoline or diesel or other crude oil products.
There’s a wide range of deeply bad effects from gasoline/diesel/etc consumption. It’s part of a larger story about fossil fuels which is having a devastating impact on the climate, environment, our health, our freedom and more.
THAT’s where the focus needs to be.
- Electrify America aims to simplify electric car charging - May 15, 2019
- Telling your neighbors about your electric car helps them over the hump - May 12, 2019
- Illinois EV tax echos question of road funding when gas taxes shrink - May 10, 2019
- Biden/Ukraine story getting more heat and suspiciousness - May 2, 2019
- Explosion at APS energy storage unit injures firefighters, casts doubt on energy storage - April 23, 2019
- No, Tesla is not phasing out the J1772 adapter - April 17, 2019
- Near destruction of the Notre Dame contains lesson in thinking ahead - April 16, 2019
- Nepotism bites VP Joe Biden as he starts 2020 Presidential run - April 13, 2019
- Tesla almost kills $35k Model 3, launches lease program, still shows misleading pricing - April 13, 2019
- Tesla CEO Elon Musk giving flawed charging advice on Twitter - April 11, 2019