Today the California Fuel Cell Partnership newsletter announced the opening of a hydrogen refueling station in Oakland. It is described as the tenth hydrogen refueling station in the San Francisco Bay Area, and is a True Zero station operated by First Element. However a perusal of the hydrogen station status map on the CAFCP website shows that almost every hydrogen station in the SF Bay Area is offline.
Fuel Cell car owners in the SF Bay Area clearly cannot be driving their cars in the current situation, therefore have an expensive paperweight gracing their driveways, and are no doubt angry.
Back in June 2019, an explosion at an Air Products facility in Santa Clara derailed hydrogen supply in the SF Bay Area. That explosion concerned refueling equipment that supplied the trucks that brought hydrogen to the refueling stations in the area. Since June, nearly every station in the SF Bay Area remain OFFLINE, and stations in the Sacramento and Los Angeles areas have had spotty availability.
It appears the current situation in Southern California is that stations are well supplied, with a few running low on fuel. But stations in Northern California have generally had the same status since June 2, 2019, that there is a significant hydrogen supply disruption.
We know what that disruption was, the explosion at the Air Products plant in Santa Clara.
This situation illustrates two risks with relying on hydrogen for fueling fuel cell cars:
- Supply to stations is fragile, since it relies on a truck rolling from a hydrogen generation plant
- There are very few hydrogen stations – especially when compared to the number of DC fast charging stations for electric cars.
There are two popular approaches for achieving zero emission transportation. One is fuel cell cars – and to believe they are “zero emission” you have to ignore the fact that the hydrogen is usually stripped out of natural gas, making hydrogen a fossil fuel in disguise. The other is electric cars, where the solution to rapid refueling is DC fast charging stations.
The SF Bay Area has dozens if not a couple hundred DC fast charging stations while there is a handful of hydrogen stations. There would be two reasons for this – there are relatively few hydrogen cars available for purchase, and the cost of hydrogen refueling stations is dramatically higher than for DC fast charging stations. California earmarked about $2 million in subsidies for each hydrogen station, while it is known that installing a DC fast charging station costs about $100,000.
This means that fast charging infrastructure for electric cars will innately expand faster than hydrogen refueling infrastructure for fuel cell cars. Therefore by the time the fuel cell car makers get production levels to a reasonable level, electric car adoption will be vastly bigger and the support infrastructure for electric cars will likewise be vastly bigger.
The status map for September 2019 is shown above. The status map back in June 2019 was:
This is the status of stations in the SF Bay Area per the CAFCP status map.
|Mill Valley||Offline (significant hydrogen supply disruption)||TrueZero|
|Oakland||Online (the one which just opened)||TrueZero|
|South San Francisco||Offline (significant hydrogen supply disruption)||TrueZero|
|Hayward||Offline (significant hydrogen supply disruption)||TrueZero|
|Fremont||Offline (low on fuel, no deliveries scheduled at this time)||TrueZero|
|Palo Alto||Offline (intermittent supply issues)||Air Liquide|
|Mountain View||Offline (maintenance)||Iwatani|
|San Jose North||Offline (no fuel)||TrueZero|
|Saratoga||Offline (“significant hydrogen supply disruption)||TrueZero|
|Campbell||Offline (no fuel)||TrueZero|
Status of other stations outside the SF Bay Area are:
|Citrus Heights (Sacramento)||Online||Shell|
|West Sacramento||Offline (for “evaluation”)||Iwatani|
|Woodland Hills||Online||Air Products|
|La Canada Flintridge||Offline (“low on fuel”)||TrueZero|
|Pasadena||Online (“low on fuel”)||TrueZero|
|Hollywood||Offline (no fuel)||TrueZero|
|West LA||Online||Air Products|
|Santa Monica||Online||Air Products|
|Playa Del Rey||Online||True Zero|
|Lawndale||Offline (no fuel)||Air Products|
|Torrance||Online (this has a pipeline)||Shell|
|Long Beach||Offline (no fuel)||TrueZero|
|Diamond Bar||Online||Air Products|
|Anaheim||Offline (compressor issue)||Air Liquide|
|Costa Mesa||Partly offline||TrueZero|
|UC Irvine||Online||Air Products|
|San Juan Capistrano||Offline (for evaluation)||Iwatani|
|Del Mar||Partly offline (low fuel)||TrueZero|
- Disease risk higher in highly polluted areas – COVID-19 risk greater? - April 1, 2020
- Conservative values failing USA as EPA guts fuel efficiency standards, fails with COVID-19 response - April 1, 2020
- SunSpec aims to help Veterans transition to clean energy jobs - March 31, 2020
- US Dept of Energy funding electric vehicle and battery research - March 6, 2020
- Bucharest abandons Oxygen tax, amid high pollution event, and Dacia’s first electric car - March 5, 2020
- Renault brand Dacia unveils most affordable electric car in Europe - March 4, 2020
- Pandemics, like Coronavirus, and our RoboTaxi-driven autonomous future - February 28, 2020
- Big advertising splash for GMC Hummer EV - January 30, 2020
- EU’s Green Deal means Romania risks losing 40% of electricity production - January 27, 2020
- Hyundai/Kia investing in Arrival to co-develop electric vehicle technology - January 16, 2020