The role of government is to nurture the common good. Really. The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution describes the role of government to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” Therefore, isn’t it within the duties of government policy to encourage good desirable results, and to discourage undesirable results? When we provably know fossil fuel consumption causes a wide range of negative environmental effects, health impacts, and is making the climate hotter, all of which threaten our very existence, isn’t it the role of government to change policies and encourage a different energy paradigm?
I’m thinking about this because the Heartland Institute (a noted climate-change-denial thought machine) sent me a press release full of quotes from their so-called experts decrying President Obama’s latest budget proposal. That proposal includes
a $10/barrel tax on oil; $1.3 billion for the Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI), which includes $750 million for the Green Climate Fund; a doubling of spending on clean energy research from $6.4 billion to $12.8 billion; $75 billion for universal pre-school and $9.6 billion for Head Start, both record levels, and $61 billion for “free” community college; and more spending on Medicare as part of the Affordable Care Act.
To my eye all these are great ideas, why didn’t the Obama Administration start with this 7 years ago? To the Heartland Institute (whom we could rename the Heartless Institute?) it’s the end of the world, time to start throwing nukes at Obama. Their so-called experts talk about “a budget written by cronies for cronies at the expense of the people. Higher taxes, more dependency on government, picking winners and losers” — all the old tired canards of these kind of people whose job it is to protect the fossil fuel industry.
That “picking winners and losers” line is interesting since the role of government is to “promote the general welfare”. That means to discourage those things that harm the general welfare, while encouraging positive results, doesn’t it? Hence, the role of government is to pick winning technologies over losing technologies. Note, I said technologies, not companies.
With that in mind, here’s some testimony from NREL on what it is NREL is doing to promote “sustainable transportation.” It’s cool stuff … cars on the horizon that don’t crash and don’t harm the environment.
To me.. THIS is the role of government – To run research laboratories that help create technologies which help us all. To help steer industry in positive directions. To develop the foundational understanding on topics like the environmental impact of existing technologies, so we can collectively make better technology choices in the future.
Unfortunately, much of what this guy said focuses on the Hydrogen Economy (fuel cells, hydrogen fueling infrastructure, etc). While fuel cells are cool, I don’t think they’re suitable for small mobile applications like passenger cars.
<iframe frameborder=’0′ width=’512′ height=’330′ scrollable=’no’ src=’http://www.c-span.org/video/standalone/?c4577470′></iframe>
- No, Tesla is not phasing out the J1772 adapter - April 17, 2019
- Near destruction of the Notre Dame contains lesson in thinking ahead - April 16, 2019
- Nepotism bites VP Joe Biden as he starts 2020 Presidential run - April 13, 2019
- Tesla almost kills $35k Model 3, launches lease program, still shows misleading pricing - April 13, 2019
- Tesla CEO Elon Musk giving flawed charging advice on Twitter - April 11, 2019
- Did Toyota spur the electrification craze? What does history say about electric vehicles? - April 9, 2019
- Elon Musk claims Tesla Autopilot drivers less mentally fatigued after long drives - March 26, 2019
- Why doesn’t Tesla install CHAdeMO or ComboChargingSystem charging stations? - March 22, 2019
- Tesla plans to keep more stores open, re-increase prices, backtracking on previous plan - March 11, 2019
- Imperial Beach CA backs off from “managed retreat” from the ocean that was their plan for sea level rise response - March 7, 2019