The role of government is to nurture the common good. Really. The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution describes the role of government to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.” Therefore, isn’t it within the duties of government policy to encourage good desirable results, and to discourage undesirable results? When we provably know fossil fuel consumption causes a wide range of negative environmental effects, health impacts, and is making the climate hotter, all of which threaten our very existence, isn’t it the role of government to change policies and encourage a different energy paradigm?
I’m thinking about this because the Heartland Institute (a noted climate-change-denial thought machine) sent me a press release full of quotes from their so-called experts decrying President Obama’s latest budget proposal. That proposal includes
a $10/barrel tax on oil; $1.3 billion for the Global Climate Change Initiative (GCCI), which includes $750 million for the Green Climate Fund; a doubling of spending on clean energy research from $6.4 billion to $12.8 billion; $75 billion for universal pre-school and $9.6 billion for Head Start, both record levels, and $61 billion for “free” community college; and more spending on Medicare as part of the Affordable Care Act.
To my eye all these are great ideas, why didn’t the Obama Administration start with this 7 years ago? To the Heartland Institute (whom we could rename the Heartless Institute?) it’s the end of the world, time to start throwing nukes at Obama. Their so-called experts talk about “a budget written by cronies for cronies at the expense of the people. Higher taxes, more dependency on government, picking winners and losers” — all the old tired canards of these kind of people whose job it is to protect the fossil fuel industry.
That “picking winners and losers” line is interesting since the role of government is to “promote the general welfare”. That means to discourage those things that harm the general welfare, while encouraging positive results, doesn’t it? Hence, the role of government is to pick winning technologies over losing technologies. Note, I said technologies, not companies.
With that in mind, here’s some testimony from NREL on what it is NREL is doing to promote “sustainable transportation.” It’s cool stuff … cars on the horizon that don’t crash and don’t harm the environment.
To me.. THIS is the role of government – To run research laboratories that help create technologies which help us all. To help steer industry in positive directions. To develop the foundational understanding on topics like the environmental impact of existing technologies, so we can collectively make better technology choices in the future.
Unfortunately, much of what this guy said focuses on the Hydrogen Economy (fuel cells, hydrogen fueling infrastructure, etc). While fuel cells are cool, I don’t think they’re suitable for small mobile applications like passenger cars.
<iframe frameborder=’0′ width=’512′ height=’330′ scrollable=’no’ src=’http://www.c-span.org/video/standalone/?c4577470′></iframe>
- FBI alleges VW Executives were informed and approved of diesel cheat - January 11, 2017
- Climate Change making the Arctic abnormally warm – Again - December 18, 2016
- Clinton claims, in leaked e-mails, anti-fracking groups funded by Putin (Russia) - October 12, 2016
- Dieselgate-like problem found in television sets by new NRDC report - September 22, 2016
- The 238 mile range Chevy Bolt is not a threat to Tesla Motors, Tesla is a threat to itself - September 14, 2016
- BMW, VW, ChargePoint claim to finish East/West charging corridors rings hollow - September 14, 2016
- Chinese Model S auto-pilot crash says we shouldn’t rely on autopilot mode, yet - September 14, 2016
- TI enabling smart EVSE’s by adding WiFi to charging station reference design - August 30, 2016
- Do we need a 500 mile range Tesla or other electric car? - August 27, 2016
- ChargePoint et al argues PG&E’s charging station plan is anti-competitive - August 10, 2016