NRDC’s Luke Tonachel testifies in joint EPA and Dept of Transportation hearings that the proposed CAFE standards upgrade would produce huge economic and environmental benefits.
Today in Detroit was the first of three public hearings on the Obama Administrations proposal to increase CAFE standards to 54.5 MPG equivalent fuel efficiency by 2025 (see http://www.epa.gov/otaq/climate/regulations.htm). Among those giving testimony was Luke Tonachel a senior analyst in the Energy and Transportation program at the Natural Resources Defense Council, and he helpfully posted his prepared comments on the NRDC’s Switchboard blog this morning.
The three hearings are focused on gathering input from the public on the proposed increase in the CAFE standards, and a draft environmental impact statement drafted by the NHTSA (see link below). They are being held jointly by the EPA and US Dept of Transportation, the first was today in Detroit, the second will be on Thursday in Philadelphia, and the last will be next Tuesday in San Francisco.
Tonachel notes that thirteen automakers and dealers have “recognized the standards are good for business” and that labor leaders and many others are in favor of increasing the CAFE standards. For example Ford Automotive is moving forward with an aggressive program of increasing fuel efficiency through weight reduction, turbo-charging, and electrification. But, as can be expected, not all are in agreement such as the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) and a few Republican politicians.
In his testimony Tonachel portrays the stakes as being very high. The higher CAFE standards would save the American economy “a half trillion dollars over the next 20 years” in fuel that we as a nation would not have to buy and burn. Because the U.S. imports nearly 60% of the oil it consumes, the half trillion dollars breaks down to $350 billion going to OPEC (in other words, imported oil) and $150 billion to U.S. oil producers. The higher CAFE standards would mean that $500 billion dollars is available to be spent on other things besides oil, and if it were invested properly would “create almost 500,000 new jobs” and at the same time cut “carbon pollution by the equivalent of 76 coal power plants.”
A more efficient car burns less fuel, giving the owner savings “of up to $4,400 over the life of their vehicles under the standard”. This is a significant economic benefit for both each individual person as well as the entire country.
As can be expected in the current political climate, some are fighting against the proposed standards. Irregardless of the resistance against the proposal, there is both broad-range support and technological feasibility as demonstrated by the automakers’ existing plans. Thirteen automakers gave statements of commitment last July when the new standards were first proposed. All of the automakers have technology under development to increase fuel efficiency such as turbo-charged engines producing torque while expending less fuel, weight reduction efforts to reduce fuel requirements, as well as the range of electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, and fuel cells vehicles that’s getting all the attention.
Tonachel notes that “80 percent of new vehicles in 2025 will be internal combustion engine-powered vehicles,” with hybrid or electric vehicles making up the rest. The required fuel efficiency gains will be made through the technology improvements being developed.
Tonachel cites support for the proposal from “almost all of the auto industry,” from both Democratic and Republican politicians, consumer advocacy groups, national security groups, economists, business leaders, the UAW, environmental organizations, and a recent poll conducted by Consumer Reports found that “77 percent wanted the government to raise and enforce stronger fuel efficiency standards.”
In short the NRDC’s message is that the CAFE standards has broad ranging support, is technologically feasible, and provides many tremendous benefits.
Originally published at TorqueNews: http://www.torquenews.com/1075/nrdc-urges-obama-administration-move-forward-upgrading-cafe-standards
- Highway design could decrease death and injury risk, if “we” chose smarter designs - March 28, 2015
- GM really did trademark “range anxiety”, only later to abandon that mark - March 25, 2015
- US Government releases new regulations on hydraulic fracturing, that some call “toothless” - March 20, 2015
- Tesla Motors magic pill to solve range anxiety doesn’t quite instill range confidence - March 19, 2015
- Update on Galena IL oil train – 21 cars involved, which were the supposedly safer CP1232 design - March 7, 2015
- Another oil bomb train – why are they shipping crude oil by train? – Symptoms of fossil fuel addiction - March 6, 2015
- Chevron relinquishes fracking in Romania, as part of broader pull-out from Eastern European fracking operations - February 22, 2015
- Answer anti- electric car articles with truth and pride – truth outshines all distortions - February 19, 2015
- Apple taking big risk on developing a car? Please, Apple, don’t go there! - February 16, 2015
- Toyota, Nissan, Honda working on Japanese fuel cell infrastructure for Japanese government - February 12, 2015