Toxic flammable crude oil from Bakken causing problems for oil shipment and processing companies

Crude oil coming from hydraulic fracturing dependent oil operations in the Bakken Shale region are more dangerous, more explosive, than crude oil from other sources. Crude oil isn’t normally seen as a high explosion risk hazmat material. The train derailment in Quebec in July that resulted in a huge explosion and fire that killed a bunch of people showed that Bakken crude oil is dangerous in this way.

Electric vehicle charging station guide

According to a report on Bloomberg News, a U.S. Federal Railroad Administration is looking into whether chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing are corroding rail tank cars and increasing risks. Additionally, three pipeline companies including Enbridge are reporting that Bakken crude oil with too much hydrogen sulfide is reaching refineries, and putting workers at risk because it is more flammable and toxic than regular crude oil.

North Dakota’s oil boom has mushroomed to more than 790,000 barrels a day this year up from from about 150,000 barrels in 2008. That production is overwhelmingly being transported by train (75%) rather than pipeline.

At the Canadian train wreck, regulators are testing the crude oil and wondering why the derailment led to such an intense inferno, which regulators have called “abnormal.”

The Bakken oil boom is overwhelmingly reliant on hydraulic fracturing. The technique uses toxic chemicals like hydrochloric acid to fracture rocks underground and release the oil.

Clearly some of those toxic chemicals are staying with the crude oil. Or, from the Bloomberg report: “If the hydrochloric acid is carried with the oil into rail cars, corrosion can be an issue,” Andy Lipow, president of Houston-based Lipow Oil Associates LLC, said in an e-mail.
In June, Enbridge won an emergency order to reject oil with high
hydrogen-sulfide levels from its system after telling the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission that it found dangerous levels of the compound at
a rail terminal in Berthold, North Dakota.  Enbridge also won FERC permission to refuse shipment of any delivery of oil with hydrogen sulfide that exceeded 5 parts per million.

Source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-13/north-dakota-oil-boom-seen-adding-costs-for-rail-safety.html

About David Herron

David Herron is a writer and software engineer living in Silicon Valley. He primarily writes about electric vehicles, clean energy systems, climate change, peak oil and related issues. When not writing he indulges in software projects and is sometimes employed as a software engineer. David has written for sites like PlugInCars and TorqueNews, and worked for companies like Sun Microsystems and Yahoo.

About David Herron

David Herron is a writer and software engineer living in Silicon Valley. He primarily writes about electric vehicles, clean energy systems, climate change, peak oil and related issues. When not writing he indulges in software projects and is sometimes employed as a software engineer. David has written for sites like PlugInCars and TorqueNews, and worked for companies like Sun Microsystems and Yahoo.

Leave a Reply